John Freeman of Rowan: the McCulloh Tract 8 deed (c.1763)




 In the early 1760s, a John Freeman appears in Rowan County, North Carolina, as a landowner buying into the McCulloh proprietary on the Yadkin/Pee Dee watershed—nearly a generation before my Freeman line shows up near the future Knox County, Tennessee in the 1790s. This Rowan presence is a critical way‑point when trying to understand where “my” John (born about 1755) may have been before the well‑known western North Carolina and Tennessee records.

How does this John fit my line?
The John Freeman in this Rowan deed is clearly an established landowner by the early 1760s, already able to pay £19 cash for 300 acres inside McCulloh’s Tract 8. That timing almost certainly makes him a man of the 1720s generation—roughly old enough to be the father of our Aaron Freeman (born about 1745) or my John Freeman (born about 1755), rather than one of them himself. At most, he could plausibly be the father of one of the anchor patriarchs (Aaron, John, or James), but not all of them simultaneously, which means this Rowan John is best treated as a possible parent or uncle in the prior generation rather than a direct stand‑in for the WNC/Knox‑era men.

On 3 May, in the third year of King George III’s reign (about 1763), Henry McCulloh, Esquire, conveyed 300 acres to “John Freeman of Rowan County” for £19 sterling. The deed explains that this land was carved from one of McCulloh’s massive proprietary blocks: eight tracts of 12,500 acres (100,000 acres total) granted to him on 3 March 1745, lying on the waters of the Yadkin or Pee Dee River and collectively known as “Tract No. Eight.” This situates John not as a random smallholder, but as a purchaser inside a planned, surveyed block that can be mapped against other McCulloh tracts and neighbors.

The metes‑and‑bounds description places John’s 300 acres on the south side line of a tract belonging to Henry Gustave McCulloh, beginning at a black oak, running through white oaks, and reaching a large poplar near a branch or “little run” before returning to the line. Although the deed relies on trees and a creek rather than modern coordinates, those clues—with the explicit reference to Tract No. 8—should allow a modern reconstruction of this tract’s approximate location on the Yadkin‑Pee Dee system, and to compare it with other Freeman and neighbor holdings in Rowan. For my purposes, this anchors at least one John Freeman squarely in Rowan county geography decades before the frontier‑era records of Knox and nearby counties.

The tenure language confirms that John received a freehold estate (“to him the said John Freeman his Heirs and Assigns forever”), in exchange for his £19 payment and the usual proprietary rents and covenants. Henry McCulloh reserved one‑half of any gold, silver, or similar valuable ores found on the land—a standard clause in these speculative grants—but otherwise passed full use of the tract, including rights of hunting, hawking, fishing, and fowling, to John. That combination—Rowan residence, ability to pay cash for 300 acres, and integration into McCulloh’s tract structure—marks this John as an established adult by the early 1760s and makes him a prime candidate either to be the same man later documented in the WNC/TN frontier, or at minimum to be part of the immediate family cluster from which my John (born ~1755) emerged.


Source and citation
The full text and image of this deed come from the Rowan County records filmed and published at FamilySearch, “Rowan. Court Records 1755–1915,” Deeds, McCulloh to Freeman, about 1763. The specific item is accessible (with a free FamilySearch account) at:
FamilySearch digital imagehttps://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G9DH-28BF

The following transcription is a modernized reading from that image; spelling and punctuation are lightly regularized for clarity, but the legal substance is unchanged.

This Indenture made the Third Day of May in the third Year of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord George the Third &c, Between Henry McCulloh Esqr of the one part, and John Freeman of Rowan County of the other part, Witnesseth that Whereas his Most Excellent Majesty King George the Second, by sundry Grants dated the Third of March A.D. 1745, gave & granted unto the said Henry McCulloh Eight Tracts of Land in North Carolina, containing Twelve thousand Five hundred Acres each, lying upon the Waters of the Yadkin or Pedee River and making together One Hundred Thousand Acres of Land, commonly called or known by the Name of the Tract No. Eight, with all Rights & Privileges &c as in and by the same, &c.

Now This Indenture Witnesseth that as well for and in Consideration of the sum of Nineteen pounds Sterling Money in Hand paid by the said John Freeman to the said Henry McCulloh, the Receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, as also for & in Consideration of the Rents, Covenants, Provisoes and Agreements hereinafter mentioned to be paid, performed by, and on the part of the said John Freeman his Heirs & Assigns, He the said Henry McCulloh Hath for himself & his Heirs given, granted, bargained, sold & confirmed, and by these presents doth give, grant, bargain, sell & confirm to the said John Freeman his Heirs & Assigns forever all that Piece & Parcel of Land lying & being in the County of Rowan in the Province of N. Carolina in America, being part of the said One Hundred Thousand Acres of Land commonly called or known by the Name of the Tract No. Eight, Beginning at a Black Oak in the South side Line of a Tract belonging to Henry Gustave McCulloh Esqr, running thence West 176 poles to a White Oak, thence N. 45 W. 55 poles to a White Oak, thence West 84 poles to a large Poplar near a Branch or little Run; thence N. 5 W. at about 60 poles crossing said South line, thence North along the same crossing said Creek 176 poles to a Stake in said Henry Gustave McCulloh’s Two Hundred Acres; thence East 176 poles to a Stake in the said Henry Gustave McCulloh’s line; thence South to the Beginning.

And containing in the whole Three Hundred Acres of Land, although the same is more particularly described & set forth in the platt or Map thereof hereunto annexed, with all Rights & Privileges of Hunting, Hawking, Fishing & Fowling, with all Woods, Waters & Rivers with all Profits, Commodities or Hereditaments to the same belonging or appertaining. To have & to hold to him the said John Freeman his Heirs & Assigns forever, except that in case any Mines shall be found upon the said Lands, one Half of all Gold, Silver Ore, and of all other Mines of like value whatsoever be reserved for the Use of the said Henry McCulloh his Heirs and Assigns.


Tract 8: where John’s land actually was

We are in the right zipcode! Aaron Freeman 1745's  Tavern I have estimated to have been either in that red dor or under High Rock Lake!

Henry McCulloh’s “Great Tracts” were twelve 100,000‑acre speculative blocks granted in the 1730s–1740s to attract settlers into the North Carolina backcountry, including the upper Pee Dee, Yadkin, Cape Fear, and Neuse river systems. Tract 8 was one of these 100,000‑acre blocks; surviving descriptions and later summaries place most of it along the Uwharrie River and its branches, in what was then Rowan County and is now partly Davidson, Randolph, and neighboring counties.

A particularly helpful modern overview is the “Wandering through the NC Piedmont” series, especially the post “Settlers in McCulloh’s Great Tracts 10, 9 and part of 8”:

  • Blog: Wandering through the NC Piedmont – “Settlers in McCulloh’s Great Tracts 10, 9 and part of 8” (link)

That article summarizes the Deed of Surrender list of Tract‑8 purchasers and notes that many of them are recorded in Rowan County deed books, just like John Freeman. It also places Tract 8 along the Uwharrie and its creeks, just west of the Yadkin, with examples such as Henry Eustace McCulloh’s 1,440‑acre tract on the north bank of the Uwharrie crossing Betty McGee’s Creek—geography that matches my deed’s description of John’s 300 acres on a branch or “little run” within Tract 8 on the Yadkin/Pee Dee watershed.

For broader historical context on McCulloh and his land scheme, two references are especially useful:

  • NCpedia biography: “Henry McCulloh” (link)

  • MESDA Journal article: “The Discovery of a 1737 North Carolina Manuscript Map”, which explains McCulloh’s request for 1.2 million acres and how the numbered tracts were laid out on early maps (link)

Both sources emphasize that Tracts 7–11 opened much of the North Carolina Piedmont and that McCulloh’s holdings accounted for a large share of all surveyed land in the colony at the time. That means John Freeman was not just buying an isolated farm, but taking up land inside one of the key speculative projects that defined early settlement along the Yadkin and Uwharrie.

If you want to push this further and try to map John’s exact neighborhood, there are a few practical tools:

  • McCulloh’s Great Tracts overview at ShagBark Farms, with discussion and sketches of Tracts 7, 8, and 10 (link)

  • The same Piedmont Wanderings post above, which lists individual Tract‑8 grants with Rowan deed‑book references you can cross‑plot on modern maps or in the Rowan County GIS system (Rowan GIS)

  • FamilySearch’s “North Carolina Land and Property” wiki article, which outlines how McCulloh’s patents fit into the broader land system and points to published abstracts and finding aids that cover his grants in Rowan and other Granville‑District counties (link)

Taken together, these sources let me treat Tract 8 as a semi‑mapped colonial development zone: a defined 100,000‑acre block along the Uwharrie/Yadkin system that was carved up among buyers like John Freeman, Samuel’s neighbors, and other early settlers. That geographic scaffold is what makes it possible to place John firmly in Rowan County before following the Freeman line west toward the later WNC and Knox County frontier.

Looking beyond John: other Rowan Freemans
This deed does not stand alone. In the same Rowan records, tax lists and later deeds show a small network of Freemans active along the Yadkin and its branches—men such as Samuel, Jona (Jonathan), Andrew, and Isaac Freeman who appear as taxpayers, landowners, or as boundary markers in other people’s grants. A 1759 taxables list, for example, records Samuel, John, and Jona Freeman together, suggesting an existing cluster in Rowan several years before John’s McCulloh purchase. Later deeds reference “Samuel Freeman’s line,” “improvements of Andrew Freeman,” and an Isaac Freeman line, hinting at a multi‑generation presence rather than a single isolated man passing through. A 1763 taxables list, also has John and Samuel in the same area. 

I want to thank Kim Archer for obtaining the following document from the NC State Archives. We had hoped it might name heirs for John Freeman; unfortunately, it does not. A 1772 administration bond nevertheless confirms that a John Freeman of Rowan County had died by that date, with local men posting security to administer his estate under the standard printed form used for other decedents. This places at least one John Freeman from the Rowan cluster—almost certainly a man born around the 1720s—as deceased by the early 1770s, which fits the idea that he could be a father or uncle to my Aaron (born about 1745) and my John (born about 1755), but not the same men who later surface in western North Carolina and on the Knox‑area frontier


Those records raise several questions this project still needs to answer. Is the John who buys 300 acres from McCulloh the same John who appears with Samuel and Jona on the 1759 tax list, and if so, how are those men related—brothers, father and sons, or uncle/nephew? Do the Samuel and Andrew mentioned in the Rowan deeds connect to the Samuel‑Joshua‑Temperance Freeman line documented in later grants, or are we looking at parallel Freeman families sharing a name but not a pedigree? Most importantly for my purposes: is there a documentary path from this Rowan cluster to the Aaron Freeman born about 1745 and the John Freeman born about 1755 who later surface in western North Carolina and the area that becomes Knox County, Tennessee?


Next steps: Aaron Freeman in Rowan/Iredell
The Rowan material strongly suggests that my Aaron and John did not appear out of nowhere on the western frontier; they likely emerged from, or at least passed through, an earlier Freeman cluster on the Yadkin. The challenge is to sort which of these Rowan Freemans could realistically be parents, uncles, or older cousins to Aaron (b. ~1745) and John (b. ~1755), and which belong to separate lines entirely.

In the next post, I will focus on Aaron Freeman in the Rowan/Iredell area—pulling together the tax records, land descriptions, and neighborhood patterns to see how (or whether) he can be tied back to this Rowan Freeman cluster on the Yadkin. 

2 comments:

  1. Great details, information and guidance Dave. I'll focus my efforts on the Rowan area and sorting out the Freeman's. Thanks so much for sharing your research and collaborating with us on this adventure!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, at some point we will hit a place and time where our lines start merging. For Aaron, John and possibly James this could be Rowan early 1700's. We have several documents tying Aaron very close to here in his youth so it is a great place to hunt!

    ReplyDelete

A few testing updates

  Two Big-Y Tests in the Pipeline: Closing in on the Samuel Freeman (b.1795) / John Freeman (b.1774) Split — and a New Wythe County, Virgini...